Anne Frank's diary.

There are little folds of skin all over the place, you can hardly find it... The little hole underneath is so terribly small that I simply can’t imagine how a man can get in there, let alone how a whole baby can get out!

SEXY MAMA wrote:

Thanks Cass i will try and read the books you have mentioned. My daughter has read her diary and she found it fascinating.

Cass wrote:

You know nothing
my grandpa is 90 and loves the computer and internet
You really are taking the biscuit


C'mon guys please tell me this is a windup?....the reality is too gruesome to contemplate

In 1980, because of a lawsuit in a German court, the German state
forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA], forensically examined
the original "diary" manuscript. Their analysis determined that
"significant" portions of the work were written with a ballpoint pen.
Since ballpoint pens were not available before 1951, portions of the
work were added well after the war (Anne Frank died in March 1945).

The BKA also determined that none of the "diary" handwriting matched
known examples of Anne's handwriting. Earlier handwriting experts had
determined that all of the writing in the "diary" was by the same hand.
Therefore, the entire "diary" was a postwar fake.

The true author of the diary was Jewish novelist Meyer Levin, who
demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payment for his work in a court
action against Anne's father, Otto Frank.

The truth about the Anne Frank Diary
was first revealed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Fria Ord. It
established that the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin had written the
dialogue of the "diary" and was demanding payment for his work in a
court action against Otto Frank. A condensation of the Swedish articles
appeared in the American Economic Council Letter, April 15th, 1959, as
follows: "History has many examples of myths that live a longer and
richer life than truth, and may become more effective than truth. "The
Western World has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl
through the medium of what purports to be her personally written story,
Anne Frank's Diary. Any informed literary inspection of this book would
have shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.

"A
noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point
of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, has
been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an
honorarium for Levin's work on the Anne Frank Diary."

Mr. Frank,
in Switzerland, has promised to pay to his race kin, Meyer Levin, not
less than $50,000 because he had used the dialogue of Author Levin just
as it was and "implanted" it in the diary as being his daughter's
intellectual work." Further inquiries brought a reply on May 7th, 1962
from a firm of New York lawyers, which stated: "I was the attorney for
Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank, and others. It is true
that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your
letter. That award was later set aside by the trial justice, Hon. Samuel
C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the
manner required by law. The action was subsequently settled while an
appeal from Judge Coleman's decision was pending.

Andrea Borman wrote:

Hugh wrote:Was he banned from your shitty forum?

I told you I don't know who he is.
If such a person from the 1940's was alive today they would be about 90,and I don't think a 90 year old would know how to use a computer.

MTC wrote:Some claim the diary was faked, and it was proven by German forensics to have been written in ballpoint pen which had not been invented at the time she claims to have wrote the diary.

Don't believe what your taught people, there is always an alternative view (often correct) of everything. below is another view, and it does not mean i believe that either, i'm just opened minded about so called history.

In 1980, because of a lawsuit in a German court, the German state
forensic bureau, the Bundes Kriminal Amt [BKA], forensically examined
the original "diary" manuscript. Their analysis determined that
"significant" portions of the work were written with a ballpoint pen.
Since ballpoint pens were not available before 1951, portions of the
work were added well after the war (Anne Frank died in March 1945).

The BKA also determined that none of the "diary" handwriting matched
known examples of Anne's handwriting. Earlier handwriting experts had
determined that all of the writing in the "diary" was by the same hand.
Therefore, the entire "diary" was a postwar fake.

The true author of the diary was Jewish novelist Meyer Levin, who
demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payment for his work in a court
action against Anne's father, Otto Frank.

The truth about the Anne Frank Diary
was first revealed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Fria Ord. It
established that the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin had written the
dialogue of the "diary" and was demanding payment for his work in a
court action against Otto Frank. A condensation of the Swedish articles
appeared in the American Economic Council Letter, April 15th, 1959, as
follows: "History has many examples of myths that live a longer and
richer life than truth, and may become more effective than truth. "The
Western World has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl
through the medium of what purports to be her personally written story,
Anne Frank's Diary. Any informed literary inspection of this book would
have shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.

"A
noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point
of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, has
been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an
honorarium for Levin's work on the Anne Frank Diary."

Mr. Frank,
in Switzerland, has promised to pay to his race kin, Meyer Levin, not
less than $50,000 because he had used the dialogue of Author Levin just
as it was and "implanted" it in the diary as being his daughter's
intellectual work." Further inquiries brought a reply on May 7th, 1962
from a firm of New York lawyers, which stated: "I was the attorney for
Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank, and others. It is true
that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your
letter. That award was later set aside by the trial justice, Hon. Samuel
C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the
manner required by law. The action was subsequently settled while an
appeal from Judge Coleman's decision was pending.

http://exposing-the-holocaust-hoax-archive.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/diary-of-anne-frank-is-fraud.html

Andrea Borman wrote:
Well my parents are in their late 70's and they don't know how to use a computer.
So if anyone tells them to go on the Internet they would not know what to do.
I was like that once until I learnt how to use a computer from the person sitting next to me in an internet cafe who showed me how to.

MTC wrote:But is a fact flappy that levin wrote most of the diary and was awarded a royalty fee by a u.s. court, you dont have to be anti jewish or a nazi supporter to acknowledge facts.

Pope Flapius 1st wrote:for writing a play based on the diary, not the actual diary. the damages were awarded because the people who were brought in after him to complete the play are supposed to have used some of his writings.

MTC wrote:How do you explain that the diary was written in biro then?, biro was invented years after the war.

MTC wrote:How do you explain that the diary was written in biro then?, biro was invented years after the war.

Flix wrote:Biro 1938? My dad had a biro, which I now have, doesn't work now of course but I suppose I could find a refill cartridge to fit it. It's a gold coloured metal tube with a contrast white metal spring mechanism and nib end, quite a nice item.

MTC wrote:German forensics proved the diary to be fake.

Pope Flapius 1st wrote:you better not let wyatt or M'lud hear you say that

MTC wrote: ballpoint pens were not available before 1951

Does not mean they were not invented before 1951, just not available hello!!

MTC wrote: ballpoint pens were not available before 1951

Does not mean they were not invented before 1951, just not available hello!!

Didge wrote:



Muppet!



This is a fraudulent but persistent myth. The only ballpoint ink in the diary were on slips of paper known to be inserted by someone other than Anne anyway. The writings of Anne herself are, needless to say, not in ballpoint.



Next!

wyatt1 wrote:


Don't go spoiling a good myth now.

Didge wrote:

Muppet!

This is a fraudulent but persistent myth. The only ballpoint ink in the diary were on slips of paper known to be inserted by someone other than Anne anyway. The writings of Anne herself are, needless to say, not in ballpoint.


Next!