now the british govt adopts sharia law

A GAINSBOROUGH man who plastered his front window with vile anti-Islamic hate literature has been jailed for a year.

Darren Conway, a self-confessed supporter of right-wing organisations, was given a 12-months' sentence at Lincoln Crown Court.
The court was told on Tuesday that carer Conway had covered the front
window of his ground floor flat in Heaton Street in Gainsborough with
17 photographs and posters.

Many were offensive – attacking both the prophet Mohammed and the Muslim religion.

Conway, 44, had denied displaying the religiously aggravated hate material on April 16 last year.

But he was convicted following a short trial earlier this year, when sentencing was postponed for reports to be prepared.

Judge Michael Heath told Conway: "To describe the material you put in your window as grossly offensive is an understatement.

"There is no place in a civilised society for conduct of that
sort and the only sentence I can justify for it is an immediate
custodial sentence."

Conway was also given a three-month concurrent jail sentence – to
run alongside the longer term – after admitting unlawful production of
cannabis.

Sixteen cannabis plants were found growing in his home when police visited to investigate the hate crime.

Christopher Lowe, prosecuting, said that Conway, who admitted to
supporting both the BNP and the English Defence League, was caught after
a member of the public complained to police.

"Later that day police attended the premises and found 17 posters and images

in the front window in full public view," said Mr Lowe.

"The majority of the displayed posters and images were undoubtedly offensive to the Islamic faith.

"Conway was arrested at the scene and taken into police custody.

"He appeared to make out that those posters were, more or less, an opportunity to get back at his landlord.

"He was trying to justify them on a political and religious basis.

"In the back room was found a small grow of cannabis plants. Sixteen plants were growing under heated lamps."

Tony Stanton, in mitigation, said Conway appeared to have
displayed the material as part of an ongoing dispute with his landlord.

He said Conway had no history of similar offending and spent much of his time caring for his elderly father.

"His father has suffered multiple strokes and cannot get out," said Mr Stanton.

"This defendant involves himself in regular activity such as
shopping for his father. That person would suffer should he lose his
liberty."
http://www.thisislincolnshire.co.uk/Gainsborough-man-jailed-anti-Islam-images-flat/story-15455418-detail/story.html
its is now illegal to insult islam and muhhamad

It would appear the silent invasion is gaining more and more voice.

Judge Michael Heath told Conway: "To describe the material you put in your window as grossly offensive is an understatement.

"There is no place in a civilised society for conduct of that sort and the only sentence I can justify for it is an immediate
custodial sentence."

Can i put 17 offensive posters up in my front window of slayting Jesus or GOD????

I think there is actually a WORD FOR IT.

BLASPHEMY

SEXY MAMA wrote:Can i put 17 offensive posters up in my front window of slayting Jesus or GOD????

I think there is actually a WORD FOR IT.

BLASPHEMY

and yet there are no blasphemy laws in the uk

unless of course its islam, then all secular laws are trampled in order to enforce sharia

Smelly_bandit wrote:Judge Michael Heath told Conway: "To describe the material you put in your window as grossly offensive is an understatement.

"There is no place in a civilised society for conduct of that sort and the only sentence I can justify for it is an immediate
custodial sentence."

If it were a level playing field this idiot and idiots like him would be in prison.

Smelly_bandit wrote:Judge Michael Heath told Conway: "To describe the material you put in your window as grossly offensive is an understatement.

"There is no place in a civilised society for conduct of that sort and the only sentence I can justify for it is an immediate
custodial sentence."

So how is this allowed then?

Yep....one law for them and one law for us

Smelly_bandit wrote:Judge Michael Heath told Conway: "To describe the material you put in your window as grossly offensive is an understatement.

"There is no place in a civilised society for conduct of that sort and the only sentence I can justify for it is an immediate
custodial sentence."

Yes this idiot should have been jailed.

SEXY MAMA wrote:



Yes this idiot should have been jailed.

and yet because he was a mulism he wasn't

Smelly_bandit wrote:

and yet because he was a mulism he wasn't

How sure are you about this? He could have been. A police man could have arrested him after seeing the banner.

Costa wrote:

So how is this allowed then?

Yep....one law for them and one law for us

it gets worse than that


A taxi driver ranted
racial abuse outside a Jewish school after getting stuck in a traffic
jam.

Taha Osman shrieked ‘All Jewish children must die!’ after his car was
hemmed in by parents picking up pupils outside King David School in
Crumpsall.

Two mums on the school run and a teaching assistant were singled out in a
foul-mouthed and ‘frightening’ tirade witnessed by kids, Manchester
Crown Court heard.

Osman – an Iraqi Kurd who has settled in Britain – also shouted that
Jewish people were ‘animals’ who ‘should not be allowed in this
country’.

The 36-year-old denied causing religiously aggravated harassment, alarm
or distress in a trial, but was found guilty by the jury.

Sentencing him to a community order, Judge David Stockdale QC said it
was a ‘particularly nasty offence’ – but did not warrant a jail
sentence.

The court heard that Osman, who was off-duty from his job with a
Manchester firm at the time, now faces having his private hire licence
withdrawn.

The court heard Osman launched his tirade on October 5, after a traffic
jam formed on Seymour Road outside King David School.

Osman was on his way to Tesco when he got stuck in the congestion lost
his temper at the driver in front of him, Sigal Bar-Ilan.

Caroline Franks told the court that she had collected her children, aged
four and six, from the school, when she saw him shouting at Mrs
Bar-Ilan.

When Mrs Franks got out of her vehicle to help the woman manoeuvre her
car, Osman screamed vile racial insults at them both.

Mrs Bar-Ilan said her daughter began to cry and her son asked ‘Why’s the
man shouting at you mummy?’ She told the jury the incident ‘scared the
hell out of my children and out of me’.

Mrs Franks said the abuse continued even after she got back in her car,
and Joanne Cantor, a teaching assistant, said she was ‘shocked’ by the
rant, which led the victims to contact people.

Sentencing Osman, of Roch Bank, Blackley, Judge Stockdale said that his
language had been of the ‘utmost offensiveness’.

He added: “Your rant on that afternoon crossed the boundary between what
would have been ill-mannered, foul-mouthed loutish behaviour into the
territory of criminal behaviour.

“This was because you launched into a racist verbal attack on the Jewish
community in general.

“Your behaviour and language was precisely the language and behaviour
the legislation is designed to prevent. This was a most serious offence
of its type.”

Read more at: http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1435472_why-is-that-man-shouting-at-you-mummy-taxi-driver-hurled-racist-abuse-at-mums-outside-jewish-school-in-crumpsall

SEXY MAMA wrote:Can i put 17 offensive posters up in my front window of slayting Jesus or GOD????

I think there is actually a WORD FOR IT.

BLASPHEMY

Frankly SM, I think if you did that no-one would take much notice, just dismiss you as a bit of a nutter. You certainly wouldn't be carted off to prison. Most Christians see their religion as something in the background of society, they don't live their lives around it, that smacks of fanaticism.

SEXY MAMA wrote:Can i put 17 offensive posters up in my front window of slayting Jesus or GOD????

I think there is actually a WORD FOR IT.

BLASPHEMY

morning mama x

do you think that blasphemy should be a criminal offence?

Smelly_bandit wrote:

and yet because he was a mulism he wasn't

They are defended by the terrorist response to such arrest.

gelico wrote:

morning mama x

do you think that blasphemy should be a criminal offence?

Hi Geli xxx

What i believe is we should have the same law for everyone.

Yes i believe so. Its offensive to me when i see Jesus being slated.

boomboomafridi wrote:

They are defended by the terrorist response to such arrest.

correct

our entire govt has capitulated to the threat of terrorism

it appears that threats of violence are a greater force than democracy and freedom

SEXY MAMA wrote:

Hi Geli xxx

What i believe is we should have the same law for everyone.

Yes i believe so. Its offensive to me when i see Jesus being slated.

if that's what you believe mama then all Muslims would be guilty of blasphemy by virtue of the fact that you don't believe Jesus is the son of god

get yourself down to the nick

SEXY MAMA wrote:

Hi Geli xxx

What i believe is we should have the same law for everyone.

Yes i believe so. Its offensive to me when i see Jesus being slated.

Christ SM, we abandoned these sort of laws ages ago - you'd have us setting up witchcraft trials next.

SEXY MAMA wrote:Can i put 17 offensive posters up in my front window of slayting Jesus or GOD????

I think there is actually a WORD FOR IT.

BLASPHEMY

In all honesty HotChick..........i believe you could and probably nobody would actually batter an eye lid...

SEXY MAMA wrote:

Hi Geli xxx

What i believe is we should have the same law for everyone.

Yes i believe so. Its offensive to me when i see Jesus being slated.

Well, blasphemy is a criminal offence now under a different name

If someone were to stand outside a mosque and declare that mohammed was a false prophet they would be arrested and charged - not for blasphemy - but for a stirring up religious hatred or some such.

Tess wrote:

Christ SM, we abandoned these sort of laws ages ago - you'd have us setting up witchcraft trials next.

gelico wrote:

Well, blasphemy is a criminal offence now under a different name

If someone were to stand outside a mosque and declare that mohammed was a false prophet they would be arrested and charged - not for blasphemy - but for a stirring up religious hatred or some such.

I am quite sure a muslim campaiging outside a church would not be a big issue.

dodge is awfully quiet on this thread

SEXY MAMA wrote:Can i put 17 offensive posters up in my front window of slayting Jesus or GOD????

I think there is actually a WORD FOR IT.

BLASPHEMY

BLASPHMY??? well islam is guilty if that by pronouncing allah is the one true god duh.

Smelly_bandit wrote:dodge is awfully quiet on this thread

Because he finds facts hard to deal with and he doesnt want his bubble popping the twwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwit that he is.

im so pissed off i just cant say much other than bollox to everything.