ain't that the truth

How absurd, a gun was invented to kill, a spoon was invented to help make eating easier.

Phil Didge wrote:How absurd, a gun was invented to kill, a spoon was invented to help make eating easier.

Kind of dumb aren't you?

Tess wrote:

Kind of dumb aren't you?

Why is that Tess?
Because I think people who advocate owning weapons invented to kill are idiots?
To then compare a weapon invented to kill compared to a spoon.
Yes it was rather dumb to make an argument over how that person gets fat compared to people illegally selling guns to people which are then used to kill people.
Not sure if people are illegally selling spoons, to then hold up a store.

Of course there is this mind:

Phil Didge wrote:

Why is that Tess?
Because I think people who advocate owning weapons invented to kill are idiots?
To then compare a weapon invented to kill compared to a spoon.
Yes it was rather dumb to make an argument over how that person gets fat compared to people illegally selling guns to people which are then used to kill people.
Not sure if people are illegally selling spoons, to then hold up a store.

Christ . Google 'allegory'...

Tess wrote:

Christ .  Google 'allegory'...

He is not going to help you.
I have no need, being as already explained Tess, it is a poor attempt to excuse guns off a poor argument.

The Machete was devised to aid people hacking their way through the jungle and not for modern day Apes to hack their way to the post office counter to rob it.

Phil Didge wrote:How absurd, a gun was invented to kill, a spoon was invented to help make eating easier.

a gun is a tool just like a spoon. vEry few guns have killed people without a person pulling the trigger

Phil Didge wrote:

Tess wrote:

Kind of dumb aren't you?

Why is that Tess?
Because I think people who advocate owning weapons invented to kill are idiots?
To then compare a weapon invented to kill compared to a spoon.
Yes it was rather dumb to make an argument over how that person gets fat compared to people illegally selling guns to people which are then used to kill people.
Not sure if people are illegally selling spoons, to then hold up a store.

Phil Didge wrote:

Tess wrote:

Kind of dumb aren't you?

Why is that Tess?
Because I think people who advocate owning weapons invented to kill are idiots?
To then compare a weapon invented to kill compared to a spoon.
Yes it was rather dumb to make an argument over how that person gets fat compared to people illegally selling guns to people which are then used to kill people.
Not sure if people are illegally selling spoons, to then hold up a store.

selling guns in america is perfectly legal and owning one is enshrined in their constitution. I see what you have done there, you have confused gun shops with gangsters.

it would appear that the humble spoon is also a lethal weapon.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2535653/Florida-killer-murdered-prison-guard-spoon-executed-chowing-on.html

does that mean all spoons are murderous???

Phil Didge wrote:

He is not going to help you.
I have no need, being as already explained Tess, it is a poor attempt to excuse guns off a poor argument.

"Google 'allegory'...

He is not going to help you."



I rest my case - fuck me it's like trying to explain Neoplatonism to a potato.

Tess wrote:

"Google 'allegory'...

He is not going to help you."



I rest my case - fuck me it's like trying to explain Neoplatonism to a potato.

 Stop picking on Spud.



   

Like The picture.



Didge is showing himself to be an idiot again.





Or maybe it's something else......


He definately appears to exhibit more than one or two of these behaviours.....



http://www.popsugar.com/moms/Signs-Asperger-Syndrome-27332056



Especially the meltdowns and unable to understand subtleties of language and humour....

I love it all have gone into meltdown mode of retards, not being able to refute my points.
That has to be the best measure of intelligence you can find, the evidence being infantile, where they seek to distract.

PMSL

Flap Gallagher wrote:
selling guns in america is perfectly legal and owning one is enshrined in their constitution. I see what you have done there, you have confused gun shops with gangsters.

Is that now your moral and ethical argument because some people made it law?

I see what you have done there, you have tried to justify a stupid notion that people should be able to carry guns off another stupid notion?
Your evidence then is based on people being stupid?

Did God or evolution forget you when handing out brains?

Flap Gallagher wrote:it would appear that the humble spoon is also a lethal weapon.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2535653/Florida-killer-murdered-prison-guard-spoon-executed-chowing-on.html

does that mean all spoons are murderous???

Only when in the hands of certain people.

Flap Gallagher wrote:it would appear that the humble spoon is also a lethal weapon.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2535653/Florida-killer-murdered-prison-guard-spoon-executed-chowing-on.html

does that mean all spoons are murderous???

Are you trying to claim the spoon was invented to kill?

Compared to something designed to kill as a gun?

Your argument is on adaption and not on the use of the tool, thus very absurd.

Does that mean you cannot tell the difference behind the invention of an item?

Seriously, how fucked up is that claim of yours?

Flap Gallagher wrote:
a gun is a tool just like a spoon. vEry few guns have killed people without a person pulling the trigger

Yes it is a tool which has only one meaningful function.
To kill.
5th moral and ethical argument by dean shown to be stupid.
Argument on people pulling the trigger, again absurd, the reasoning behind owning a weapon is for either defense or attack. If that is the case the intent is to use that weapon by activated its mechanism.
Remember no guns can kill on their own, that is why it took man to invent them to use them, to kill.
So few guns have killed people, without someone operating it, that is why humans should not possess them, as in their hands, they kill people. Thanks for proving my point. 
Whatever way you look at your post, it is very retarded

Deans a Retard ?


   

ALLAKAKA wrote:Deans a Retard ?


   

Nahhhh.
Some of his views are though.

Flap Gallagher wrote:

totally

gelico wrote:


totally

Nail on the head, is what people use to perform deflections, gelico, thank you.

Phil Didge wrote:

Flap Gallagher wrote:
selling guns in america is perfectly legal and owning one is enshrined in their constitution. I see what you have done there, you have confused gun shops with gangsters.

Is that now your moral and ethical argument because some people made it law?

I see what you have done there, you have tried to justify a stupid notion that people should be able to carry guns off another stupid notion?
Your evidence then is based on people being stupid?

Did God or evolution forget you when handing out brains?

you are the one making outlandish claims about something that is nothing to do with the picture in the OP.

guns are no more moral that spoons or a pile of dog crap.
A gun will not leap of the shelf and kill you, it is an inanimate piece of metal, wood or plastic.
Guns only kill because a person chooses to use it as a tool. People get fat because they choose to eat too much. Often using spoons to do so, although the sign could just as easily read knife and fork.
next you will be claiming knives are not made to kill. That would be absolutely irrellevent to the point being made by the picture, just as your entire premise and argument is irrellevent to the picture.