the god emperor crushes the enemies of mankind

The moment drone strike blew up Qassem Soleimani, two Iranian Revolutionary Guard GENERALS, a colonel and six others in Baghdad as Supreme Leader promises 'jihad' against America amid fears of 'devastating war'

This is the moment two Islamic Revolutionary Guard generals were killed in the US airstrike on Baghdad airport which also killed Quds commander Qassem Soleimani.

CCTV footage filmed close to the airport and shared by Iraqi TV station [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] shows a large explosion as one of the two cars was destroyed by precision missiles early on Friday morning.

Brigadier General Hussein Jafari Nia and Major-General Hadi Taremi were named among the dead by the semi-official Fars agency, along with Colonel of the Guards Shahroud Mozaffari Nia and Captain Waheed Zamanian.

Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, deputy-commander of the Iraqi-based pro-Iran People's Mobilization Forces, was also among the dead - vaporized after being struck by one of four American guided missiles fired by a Reaper drone.

Mohammad al-Shibani, Muhandis's son-in-law, is also said to have died along with Heydar Ali, Muhammed Reza al-Jaberi and Hassan Abdul Hadi, all senior PMF figures. 

Iran has vowed a 'crushing revenge' and 'jihad' on the United States following the attack.

Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who is personally overseeing a meeting of the country's security council for the first time ever, proclaimed he would avenge the bitter loss of his highest ranking general, while Lebanon's Tehran-backed Hezbollah said it would ramp up its terror 'with the blessing of his pure blood.'

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

here comes the boom

good news and exposes labour as a terrorist loving enemy of the free world

Flap Zappa wrote:good news and exposes labour as a terrorist loving enemy of the free world

They were exposed a long time ago. 

I predict some salty mother fuckers on twatter over this

I thought Trump wanted to avoid sending American soldiers into more conflicts

fatbob5 wrote:I thought Trump wanted to avoid sending American soldiers into more conflicts

he does, but then he just took out the men who were planning attacks on americans.
He is not a pussy like obama who sent iran a $150billion reward. He is a man who will protect america and americans, as any president should. Sometimes that requires sending people into battle.
Iran will lose. They have never won a war. I am surprised that a left winger would support a regime that is empire building, hangs gays from cranes, locks up and tortures women for showing their hair, and has killed hundreds if not thousands of their own citizens in recent years. But I guess TDS makes you do weird things.
Iran want to re-establish the persian empire. Soleimani was instrumental in spreading death and destruction throughout the region.

fatbob5 wrote:I thought Trump wanted to avoid sending American soldiers into more conflicts

What do you think he should have done bob??

smelly-bandit wrote:

What do you think he should have done bob??

I'm not necessarily criticising him for the attack, it depends on Intel received . I'm just stating Trump's position that you yourself have praised

fatbob5 wrote:
I'm not necessarily criticising him for the attack, it depends on Intel received . I'm just stating Trump's position that you yourself have praised

You can't criticise him for the attack, apparently no one sees to remember that just before this, the US embassy was attacked by Iran, so its only logical for him to eliminate the chief architect of those attacks. 

He isnt obama or Clinton and this was never going to be another benghazi

fatbob5 wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

What do you think he should have done bob??

I'm not necessarily criticising him for the attack, it depends on Intel received . I'm just stating Trump's position that you yourself have praised

the man was behind thousands of attacks on us troops and others over the decades. He was directly behind the recent attack that killed a us contractor. He was behind the attack on the us embassy this week and he was in iraq to plan more attacks on us interests. Why are the left defending and supporting an empire building society.
the iranian people deserve our help to get that evil regime out.

Notice how BoJo wasn't alerted beforehand of the attack.

Very Interesting

fatbob5 wrote:Notice how BoJo wasn't alerted beforehand of the attack.

Very Interesting

That simply shows how disgusting the british givt has been in recent years, Trump clearly no longer trusts the UK and with good reason I'd say

Flap Zappa wrote:
the man was behind thousands of attacks on us troops and others over the decades. He was directly behind the recent attack that killed a us contractor. He was behind the attack on the us embassy this week and he was in iraq to plan more attacks on us interests. Why are the left defending and supporting an empire building society.
the iranian people deserve our help to get that evil regime out.

If the regime collapses the country could turn into a bloodbath.
ISIS will be celebrating Trump's action

fatbob5 wrote:
If the regime collapses the country could turn into a bloodbath.
ISIS will be celebrating Trump's action

no, iran isnt iraq or libya

iran is too stable and well set up as a country, it sponsors terrorism outside its border not inside and the vast majority of the population are shia. if the regime falls i cant see it turning into dog eat dog like iraq or libya

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Why is Trump threatening to destroy Culturally Important sites?

The man is insane

fatbob5 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Why is Trump threatening to destroy Culturally Important sites?

The man is insane

iran are threatening to attack the whitehouse.
Iran were plotting to kidnap journalists off the street. Iran are threatening terror attacks on civilians, which rather emphasises the point of why Suleimani was terminated

fatbob5 wrote:Notice how BoJo wasn't alerted beforehand of the attack.

Very Interesting

no one was alerted. A secret is not a secret when you tell people

fatbob5 wrote:

Flap Zappa wrote:
the man was behind thousands of attacks on us troops and others over the decades. He was directly behind the recent attack that killed a us contractor. He was behind the attack on the us embassy this week and he was in iraq to plan more attacks on us interests. Why are the left defending and supporting an empire building society.
the iranian people deserve our help to get that evil regime out.

If the regime collapses the country could turn into a bloodbath.
ISIS will be celebrating Trump's action

people are being slaughtered already in Iran.The biggest threat to iranians is the regime

fatbob5 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Why is Trump threatening to destroy Culturally Important sites?

The man is insane

he isn't.

Flap Zappa wrote:
iran are threatening to attack the whitehouse.
Iran were plotting to kidnap journalists off the street. Iran are threatening terror attacks on civilians, which rather emphasises the point of why Suleimani was terminated

You haven't really answered my question. How would destroying, for example ' a museum help defeat the regime?

Flap Zappa wrote:
no one was alerted. A secret is not a secret when you tell people

I thought we had a special relationship with the USA. I thought BoJo was someone who Trump had respect for

smelly-bandit wrote:

no, iran isnt iraq or libya

iran is too stable and well set up as a country, it sponsors terrorism outside its border not inside and the vast majority of the population are shia. if the regime falls i cant see it turning into dog eat dog like iraq or libya

In the run up to the invasion of Iraq did you predict it would be carnage?

fatbob5 wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Why is Trump threatening to destroy Culturally Important sites?

The man is insane

youre just used to pussy hat wearing betamale manginas like obama and cameron and corbyn and macron and treudough.

top tip : their craven rush to appease at all cost is not what leaders are supposed to do bobby, along comes the god emperor and suddenly youre faced with a leader who is matched perfectly with a superpower and start shitting yourself at the sight of how things should be done.

why are you pussy libtards more than happy that this fucker has been attacking US assest for years and they havent retaliated but the one time a US president does retaliate you have one of your meltdowns???


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

fatbob5 wrote:
In the run up to the invasion of Iraq did you predict it would be carnage?

predict that a superpower staging a fullblown ground invasion of another country was going to be carnage??? not much predicting needed for that one.

the US wont be doing a whole boots on the ground invasion of iran unless Iran does something very stupid like blowing up the whitehouse, also the iranian youth are far more educated and liberal than the iraqis, the iraqis are fucking animals

iraq has a greater diversity of religious sects, the split between sunni and shia being roughly around the 70/30 mark which means that once ole saddam got overthrown, it was game on and time to settle old scores.

iran doesnt have that same problem, not doubt it will be a civil war between the supporters of the current lunatics and those who want a change but hey ho, dont fuck with the US military

smelly-bandit wrote:

predict that a superpower staging a fullblown ground invasion of another country was going to be carnage??? not much predicting needed for that one.

the US wont be doing a whole boots on the ground invasion of iran unless Iran does something very stupid like blowing up the whitehouse, also the iranian youth are far more educated and liberal than the iraqis, the iraqis are fucking animals

iraq has a greater diversity of religious sects, the split between sunni and shia being roughly around the 70/30 mark which means that once ole saddam got overthrown, it was game on and time to settle old scores.

iran doesnt have that same problem, not doubt it will be a civil war between the supporters of the current lunatics and those who want a change but hey ho, dont fuck with the US military

So, did you predict the civil war that erupted in Iraq?

You see where I'm coming from, it's very easy just to keep saying - 'Things will be different this time' over and over again.