the naked emperor

When the vain and delusional emperor walked naked through the streets
of his capital to show off his new clothes, so light and so finely
woven that they could not be seen or felt, it was only an innocent
little child, ingénue, who told the world that the emperor was naked.
The rest went along with the charade, and collaborated with the emperor
and his dishonest clothiers in order to avoid imperial ire.

Recent events and disclosures at the highest levels of our government
demonstrate that our own rulers, like the naked emperor, have through
folly and dishonesty exposed themselves as “useful idiots” or worse,
liars and functionaries whose loyalties may well be to other than the
United States

On April 10, Johnnie Carson, Assistant Secretary of State for African
Affairs, stated that “religion is not driving extremist violence” in
Nigeria. This pronouncement was made one day after Boko Haram, the uber-violent Muslim jihadist Nigerian terrorists, bombed a church killing 39 Christians.

Carson told us an unconscionable and transparent lie. In addition to
stating an obvious falsehood, given the Boko Haram’s overt and
unabashed self-definition as a brutally violent Muslim terrorist
organization which condemns all things non-Muslim as “Haram”
(prohibited), Carson also contradicted earlier State Department
assessments,
all of which argue that Nigeria’s Islamic religious terrorist violence
was so much a concern that the US Commission on International Religious
Freedom (USCIRF) recommended back in 2002 that Nigeria be placed on the United States watch list.

What impelled Mr. Carson to lie such that anyone anywhere who does
not live under a rock can see that he is lying? Joel Mowbray’s [i]Dangerous Diplomacy provides
a clue. Mowbray documents how the Saudi royal family has over the past
decades insinuated itself into our State Department by promising State
Department officials serving in the Arab world generous sinecures when
they have retired from their official duties, as long as they represent
Saudi interests to the US government while serving in the State
Department. These Saudi long-range bribes render our officials servants
of the Saudi government, representing Saudi interests to our government
instead of the other way around.[ii]

But the problem runs deeper than one State Department functionary
whose integrity may have been compromised by Muslim forces that want him
to lie on behalf of Islamic jihadist terrorists. His boss is Madame
Secretary Hillary Clinton, our Secretary of State. She has been silent
regarding his transparent lie. Is Saudi penetration so deep that even
the Secretary of State cannot publicly correct the errors of a State
Department employee; and is it only the Saudis?

Very distressingly, it may be more than the State Department alone
that is in question here. President Obama and the State Department have
been unwilling to rule out aid
to Hamas despite the fact that that very same State Department has
classified Hamas as a terrorist organization, and American law prohibits
US financial aid to terrorist organizations. As Trudy Rubin observed
last year in a Washington Post article:

<blockquote>“The most ominous interpretation of the mush coming from
the State Department (regarding aid to Hamas) is that the administration
is so rudderless, unprincipled and desperate to avoid a clear defeat in
its efforts to foist a “peace agreement” on the parties that it would
go so far as to continue to do business with the PA, despite (the PA’s)
taking on a partner that has killed Americans, seeks Israel’s
destruction and, from behind the skirts of women and the cribs of
children, has conducted a missile bombardment of Israel.”
</blockquote>
The State Department’s rudderless, unprincipled pronouncements contradict its own policy denying aid to any terrorist organization.

And in case one might think that Hamas’ terrorist history is a
function only of its violent and psychotic leaders, while the
downtrodden rank-and-file of Gazan Arabs are just tagging along for the
charitable gifts they receive from Hamas leadership, one need only note
the recent Commentary Magazine article
on the Palestinian Shikaki organization’s poll of Gazan and West Bank
Arabs. This poll shows that Hamas has lost considerable support of its
followers in the Gaza Strip due in part to its not being aggressive
enough in its terrorism against Israel.

The poll’s findings
indicate a significant decline in the popularity of Hamas in the Gaza
Strip and a decrease in its constituency’s positive evaluation of its
government compared to previous polls. Shikaki suggests that this may
be due to Hamas’ behavior, standing on the sideline, during Gaza’s
rocket war with Israel (while other Gazan terror groups carried out
numerous rocket attacks). Ironically, several Hamas leaders, especially
Isma’il Haniyeh, enjoy in the West Bank a popularity that rivals
President Abbas. Apparently it is not just the Gazan Arabs who want to
see Jews murdered.

Significant percentages of Gazan Arabs, not the leaders, nor even the
leaders’ acolytes, just the plain old day-to-day Arabs on the street,
really want Hamas and other terror groups to just keep on bombing
Israel, just keep on killing Jews. Yet the State Department and our
President are unclear as to whether or not it is a good idea for the USA
to continue to provide Hamas with hundreds of millions of tax-payer
dollars, many of which will be rerouted to support Hamas’ terrorist
efforts.
Then there is Madame Secretary’s comments on TV to a young and
activist Tunisian audience on April 17. When asked why American
Presidential candidates on both sides support Israel and Zionism, she said:

<blockquote>“Well, first, let me say you will learn as your democracy
develops that a lot of things are said in political campaigns that
should not bear a lot of attention. There are comments made that
certainly don’t reflect the United States, don’t reflect our foreign
policy, don’t reflect who we are as a people.”
</blockquote>
Our Secretary of State told her Tunisian audience, in front of
international TV, that our Presidential candidates lie to get votes, and
they are lying about their support for Israel. Then she went on to say:
<blockquote>“…watch what President Obama says and does. He’s our
President. He represents all of the United States, and he will be
reelected President, so I think that that will be a very clear signal to
the entire world as to what our values are and what our President
believes”
</blockquote>
In other words, the President is really on your side, Tunisian youth, and Obama’s pro-Israel statements in the previous campaign and during his current tenure are lies, as is the pro-Israel rhetoric of the Republican candidates.

Secretary Clinton subordinated U.S. interests to partisan
considerations and told her Muslim audience what she figured they wanted
to hear, namely that the USA does not really support Israel, that’s
just mendacious campaign rhetoric. In addition to calling her own
President and most Republican candidates liars, she also unabashedly
contradicted 65 years of the Israel-USA relationship.

What pressure, what compulsion, what intractable limitation on her
public presentations could have prevented her from simply stating the
accepted U.S. diplomatic language? Something like: “We favor a two-state solution.
We believe that Israel has a right to exist. We believe that everyone
would benefit by a negotiated, just, and lasting peace. We think that
your true enemies are poverty and dictatorship.”

By not saying something akin to this, she misrepresented 65 years of
American diplomacy, defamed her own boss and other Republican
candidates, and pandered to the interests of her Muslim audience — just
as Moray’s analysis describes.

And Obama himself, Mr. “knife in Israel’s back,” has pandered to the Persians, curtseyed to the Caliph
(king Abdullah of Saudi Arabia), flip-flopped in representing himself
on the Arab-Israel issue, and tried his best during the three years of
his presidency, to make a shambles of the traditional US-Israel
relationship.

Like the fairy tale emperor, our leaders at the highest levels have
exposed themselves. They have revealed to us their naked dishonesty.
They are not honest stewards of American society, nor honest brokers in
the Israel-Arab conflict, nor even stalwart defenders of our own
country, their own country, in Western Civilization’s defensive war
against Islamofascist, triumphalist, totalitarian, terrorist jihad.
They have been compromised by forces at least one of which is Saudi oil
money.

What will it take before we can end the lies, stop the posturing, and
call the complicity of our President and his Department of State with
Muslim jihadist terrorism what it really is?
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/04/26/our-naked-emperor/

however if half of that was true there would be no need for the muslims terrorists to conduct a war with america as america is apparently in the pocket of the saudis.

Flap Meister wrote:however if half of that was true there would be no need for the muslims terrorists to conduct a war with america as america is apparently in the pocket of the saudis.

which parts do you know to be untrue??