Is Trump guilty of Treason?

First topic message reminder :

?????

fatbob5 wrote:.......There was no widespread fraud in the election, which a range of election officials across the country including Trump’s former attorney general, William Barr, have confirmed. Republican governors in Arizona and Georgia, key battleground states crucial to Biden’s victory, also vouched for the integrity of the elections in their states. Nearly all the legal challenges from Trump and his allies have been dismissed by judges, including two tossed by the Supreme Court, which includes three Trump-nominated justices.......


https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/national-international/dominion-sues-trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-for-1-3m-for-defamation/2440594/

a project veritas investigation has lead to the arrest and charging of someone for ballot harvesting in texas.

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1349416989568196609

I am sure he was lucky enough to catch the only one doing this.

Flap Zappa wrote:
a project veritas investigation has lead to the arrest and charging of someone for ballot harvesting in texas.

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1349416989568196609

I am sure he was lucky enough to catch the only one doing this.

Not really evidence of systemic widespread fraud

Over 60 court cases, not a single one backed Trump's assertion

fatbob5 wrote:
Not really evidence of systemic widespread fraud

Over 60 court cases, not a single one backed Trump's assertion

of those 60 cases how many times was the evidence examined and dismissed as not credible??

it obviously doesnt matter to you bob, youre just an orange man bad never trumper, so any means of getting him out is acceptable to you.

not sure why you are pretending on here to be all about the integrity of the election, id prefer it if you were honest and just said "yeah fuck trump get him out by any means", id certianly have more respect for you

smelly-bandit wrote:

of those 60 cases how many times was the evidence examined and dismissed as not credible??

it obviously doesnt matter to you bob, youre just an orange man bad never trumper, so any means of getting him out is acceptable to you.

not sure why you are pretending on here to be all about the integrity of the election, id prefer it if you were honest and just said "yeah fuck trump get him out by any means", id certianly have more respect for you

....... The U.S. Supreme Court twice refused to take up Trump-endorsed lawsuits that sought to overturn the results of the Nov. 3 election.


In a one-sentence denial, the Supreme Court on Dec. 8 rejected a request from Pennsylvania Republicans that sought to overturn Biden's win in the state. The challenge, led Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa., claimed that the Republican-led state legislature's expansion of absentee voting violated the state's constitution.


Three days later, the Supreme Court refused to let Texas challenge the election results in four battleground states critical to Trump's defeat. The court said Texas did not demonstrate "a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections." .......


https://eu.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/politics/elections/2021/01/06/trumps-failed-efforts-overturn-election-numbers/4130307001/


SCOTUS is right leaning, three of the judges appointed by Trump himself

fatbob5 wrote:
....... The U.S. Supreme Court twice refused to take up Trump-endorsed lawsuits that sought to overturn the results of the Nov. 3 election.


In a one-sentence denial, the Supreme Court on Dec. 8 rejected a request from Pennsylvania Republicans that sought to overturn Biden's win in the state. The challenge, led Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa., claimed that the Republican-led state legislature's expansion of absentee voting violated the state's constitution.


Three days later, the Supreme Court refused to let Texas challenge the election results in four battleground states critical to Trump's defeat. The court said Texas did not demonstrate "a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections." .......


https://eu.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/politics/elections/2021/01/06/trumps-failed-efforts-overturn-election-numbers/4130307001/


SCOTUS is right leaning, three of the judges appointed by Trump himself

Yes and you prove the point I'm making, the case was dismissed on other legal grounds

Not on the evidence of the allegations 

If you got battered in London and turned up to a judge with panda eyes, 3 coppers with body cam footage of the attack, another ten eyewitnesses with mobile footage, 4 shop owners with cctv evidence and your attacker who is happy confess in court. 

But the court turns arounds say "soory Bob you live in Wales I can't see your case, case dismissed"

Presumably that means you never got battered because there wasn't any evidence?? 

There is a very big difference between a case being heard and getting dismissed because the evidence doesn't support the case and a case getting before its heard due to some legal technicalities

Orange man bad, get him out at all costs.

smelly-bandit wrote:

Yes and you prove the point I'm making, the case was dismissed on other legal grounds

Not on the evidence of the allegations 

If you got battered in London and turned up to a judge with panda eyes, 3 coppers with body cam footage of the attack, another ten eyewitnesses with mobile footage, 4 shop owners with cctv evidence and your attacker who is happy confess in court. 

But the court turns arounds say "soory Bob you live in Wales I can't see your case, case dismissed"

Presumably that means you never got battered because there wasn't any evidence?? 

There is a very big difference between a case being heard and getting dismissed because the evidence doesn't support the case and a case getting before its heard due to some legal technicalities

Orange man bad, get him out at all costs.

Sooooooool

Whatsa happening?

Trump and Goons have evidence of widespread voter fraud, *** but *** they are keeping it a secret.
We just have to take their word for it

Perhaps people are expected to " Use The Force " to gain understanding of the evidence of widespread voter fraud

fatbob5 wrote:

Flap Zappa wrote:
a project veritas investigation has lead to the arrest and charging of someone for ballot harvesting in texas.

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1349416989568196609

I am sure he was lucky enough to catch the only one doing this.

Not really evidence of systemic widespread fraud

Over 60 court cases, not a single one backed Trump's assertion

no, they were just lucky enough to catch the only one in america doing it.
5000 votes from 1 person paid $78000 by the demorats

fatbob5 wrote:

smelly-bandit wrote:

of those 60 cases how many times was the evidence examined and dismissed as not credible??

it obviously doesnt matter to you bob, youre just an orange man bad never trumper, so any means of getting him out is acceptable to you.

not sure why you are pretending on here to be all about the integrity of the election, id prefer it if you were honest and just said "yeah fuck trump get him out by any means", id certianly have more respect for you

....... The U.S. Supreme Court twice refused to take up Trump-endorsed lawsuits that sought to overturn the results of the Nov. 3 election.


In a one-sentence denial, the Supreme Court on Dec. 8 rejected a request from Pennsylvania Republicans that sought to overturn Biden's win in the state. The challenge, led Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa., claimed that the Republican-led state legislature's expansion of absentee voting violated the state's constitution.


Three days later, the Supreme Court refused to let Texas challenge the election results in four battleground states critical to Trump's defeat. The court said Texas did not demonstrate "a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections." .......


https://eu.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/politics/elections/2021/01/06/trumps-failed-efforts-overturn-election-numbers/4130307001/


SCOTUS is right leaning, three of the judges appointed by Trump himself

there were reports that during one of the supreme court deliberations raised voices were heard and one SC judge was heard saying there would be riots if the case was approved. That is not a way to run justice.

fatbob5 wrote:

the only time washington DC looked like a wr zone was when the demorats antifa/BLM were burning it down.

It now looks like any tin pot dictatorship where the El presidente needs the army to keep the people away from him. For bob, El Presidente is the kiddy sniffer

Flap Zappa wrote:
there were reports that during one of the supreme court deliberations raised voices were heard and one SC judge was heard saying there would be riots if the case was approved. That is not a way to run justice.

That sounds like bullpoo

Trump really has gone too far with the attack on the Capital
Even Mitch is fed up with his f*ckwittery

.
https://mobile.twitter.com/AlgernonBlackw3/status/1350517128500273159

.....President Donald Trump told the crowd to march to the Capitol and that 'you'll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.' ......


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9161887/QAnon-fanatics-discussed-posing-National-Guard-soldiers-Bidens-inauguration.html
.
.
.
Sounds like someone inciting a riot

Flap Zappa wrote:
no, they were just lucky enough to catch the only one in america doing it.
5000 votes from 1 person paid $78000 by the demorats

So basically , no evidence of widespread systematic fraud, no grand nefarious conspiracy involving Biden , Soros et al

fatbob5 wrote:
So basically , no evidence of widespread systematic fraud, no grand nefarious conspiracy involving Biden , Soros et al

i imagine if you asked a nazi about the holocaust they would say there is "no evidence of widespread systematic genocide, no grand nefarious conspiracy involving jews, hitler,goebbels et al"

smelly-bandit wrote:

i imagine if you asked a nazi about the holocaust they would say there is "no evidence of widespread systematic genocide, no grand nefarious conspiracy involving jews, hitler,goebbels et al"

WTF

The End of Trump

fatbob5 wrote:
WTF

thats what you keep saying isnt it??

no evidence of fraud or wrongdoing by the establishment

smelly-bandit wrote:

Yes and you prove the point I'm making, the case was dismissed on other legal grounds

Not on the evidence of the allegations 

If you got battered in London and turned up to a judge with panda eyes, 3 coppers with body cam footage of the attack, another ten eyewitnesses with mobile footage, 4 shop owners with cctv evidence and your attacker who is happy confess in court. 

But the court turns arounds say "soory Bob you live in Wales I can't see your case, case dismissed"

Presumably that means you never got battered because there wasn't any evidence?? 

There is a very big difference between a case being heard and getting dismissed because the evidence doesn't support the case and a case getting before its heard due to some legal technicalities

Orange man bad, get him out at all costs.

What was Trump and team going to court for then?

Flap Zappa wrote:
a project veritas investigation has lead to the arrest and charging of someone for ballot harvesting in texas.

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1349416989568196609

I am sure he was lucky enough to catch the only one doing this.

This occurred in Texas, a state that voted Trump
So irrelevant to Bidens victory

Smells
Have you been weeping a lot over the last few days?

fatbob5 wrote:

Flap Zappa wrote:
a project veritas investigation has lead to the arrest and charging of someone for ballot harvesting in texas.

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1349416989568196609

I am sure he was lucky enough to catch the only one doing this.

This occurred in Texas, a state that voted Trump
So irrelevant to Bidens victory

do you think they caught the only person doing it bob?